Archive for September, 2011

The Concept of Joint And Several Liability And The Indiana State Fair Tragedy

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

As mentioned in a prior blog, Indiana’s Attorney General recently announced that the State would pay its maximum liability of $5,000,000 to the 40 or so individuals who were physically injured in this tragedy.  While it is commendable that the State made this decision so soon after this event, it likely did not have much choice since the law of joint and several liability would apply to any claim against the State.

Under this law, if the State of Indiana was found to be even 1% responsible for this unfortunate event, the State would be legally responsible to pay 100% of the damages up to the $700,000 per person/$5,000,000 per event limit.   This would be true even if the negligence of some other corporate entity, such as the company that built the stage, was found to be the primary cause of this collapse.

Under the legal theory of joint and several liability, if one person or entity is partially responsible for causing a legal harm, that person or entity is liable to pay all damages that were suffered by the injured party, even if other persons or companies may have also caused the accident in question.  The concept of joint and several liability has existed in Indiana and in most states since the 1800’s.

Interestingly, joint and several liability only applies to governmental entities in civil tort claims and to health care providers in medical negligence claims.  All other persons and business entities are covered by what is called the law of comparative fault that I will discuss in my next blog.

Update on The Indiana State Fair Tragedy

Monday, September 12th, 2011

This past week the Attorney General for the State of Indiana indicated that the State would pay its maximum liability of $5,000,000 to the victims of this tragedy.   As mentioned in my prior blog, under Indiana law the State’s maximum liability is $700,000 per person and no more than $5,000,000 per event.  As there are now 7 deaths and a host of other very serious injuries, including a teenager who is paralyzed, these funds are not going to go very far in compensating these unfortunate individuals or their families.

Some state representatives have raised the question whether the Indiana Legislature should enact special legislation to raise the damage limitation or cap for this particular event.  Indiana has done this once previously in the case of a 4 year girl named Emily Hunt who was paralyzed at an amusement park called the Old Indiana Fun Park in 1996.  This child was paralyzed and her grandmother killed when a miniature train within the park derailed.  Although the train was supposed to have been inspected by the State, the State inspector later admitted that he wasn’t qualified to make such an inspection, and there was a substantial question whether an inspection had ever been performed.   In response to a public outcry, the Indiana Legislature raised the cap to $1.5 million from the $500,000 limit that then existed, but only for this child’s claim.  Which raises the question why does the State have a liability cap that is so low in the first place?

With many politicians, caps on damages that can be awarded are popular because they can be viewed as curtailing so called “frivolous lawsuits”.  On the other hand, any claim whose legal value is more than $700,000 is certainly not frivolous. However, if one is in the position of a liability insurance company, it is much easier to claim, at least publically, that damage caps are needed because of “frivolous lawsuits”, then it is to argue that caps are needed because people who are killed or crippled are simply being awarded too much money and insurers want more profit.

Thus far, there has been no public discussion by the City of Indianapolis to raise the $700,000 damage cap that exists for several motorcyclists, one of who was killed and another critically injured last August when an Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Officer allegedly drove his patrol car while intoxicated at a high rate of speed into several motorcyclists who were waiting at a traffic light.    Criminal charges are still pending against this police officer here in Indianapolis.